<snip>
fantastic young photographer
| NetHosted Community https://www.nethosted.co.uk/community/ |
|
| Charlotte Rutherford https://www.nethosted.co.uk/community/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2974 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Z [ Fri May 14, 2010 11:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Charlotte Rutherford |
<snip> fantastic young photographer
|
|
| Author: | Yoingco [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
| Author: | Z [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 5:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
| Author: | Yoingco [ Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
when you scroll down and then up again to the very top, on those last two pages the photos cover the logo and links. You say the links are pretty obvious, but as said; when your eyes come from the photos and then look upwards to the logo and links it takes the eyes time to adjust (split second).....mainly because of the blending (grey on pink). As said, and its only a suggestion, but try red links or purple links......a colour contrast as opposed to a colour blend. Or fade (lighten) the name (logo) a little more and/or make the links black/darker. Regards John |
|
| Author: | Z [ Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
cheers. I see it on all pages if you have a browser window like a letterbox. One a 1024x768 it works fine (for me) and there is no vertical scrolling. What size window do you have? |
|
| Author: | MaddogBattie [ Wed Jun 02, 2010 8:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I completely missed the fact that you could scroll sideways on the gallerys at first. I just wondered why it took so long for the pictures to load. I have a fairly fast broadband connection and nethosted is fast so it was unusual. The reason of course was all the pictures loading at once. I think I would add some sort of indication that there are more images available. |
|
| Author: | Z [ Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I only have slow broadband and don't have any problems. The images need to be best quality so there is no room to reduce their resolution. Any delay could be the mysql lookup. that's what the scrollbar is there for. That would be like telling people to page down of they don't see the side bar 
|
|
| Author: | MaddogBattie [ Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
People expect to scroll down. They don't expect to scroll sideways. I scroll down using the scroll wheel on my mouse which doesn't work sideways. |
|
| Author: | Z [ Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
well if everyone did what everyone expected the web would be a boring place
Time for a new mouse too lol. My 5 year old MS one scrolls horizontal as well. Maybe people without scroll wheels will see the scrollbars on the page too. |
|
| Author: | BrightEyesDavid [ Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The scrolling is an issue. It didn't take me long to figure it out, but it's a pain to have to drag or click to get through the images. Anything that makes it hard work for your visitors is generally not a good thing, no matter how much you like it yourself. |
|
| Author: | Z [ Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
and your site would be exactly the same if it didn't have javascript to navigate, you'd still have to scroll regardless of the direction. As we have a web full of people that don't like Flash, don't like JS or would have us back at just HTML to their anal standards, keeping it simple is just what some want. It's not about whether I like it, it's what the customer wants. I could have done it in jquery, flash, had bells and whistles all over it but they wanted simple. And hard work? really? scrolling horizontal and scrolling vertical take no difference in effort by my book. It works in IE6 too. |
|
| Author: | BrightEyesDavid [ Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Scrolling in general is not hard work; I specifically meant repeated, stop-start horizontal scrolling. When a visitor has to scroll right to view a row of photos with varying dimensions it can be quite awkward, especially at the lower browser windows sizes. Obviously the scroll wheel doesn't help with horizontal, either, and moving a mouse horizontally with a button held down is substantially more intensive than vertically (wrist+arm versus forward/backward with fingers). For photography sites I find it easier to look at slideshows or thumbnail galleries. Anyway - hope you're not offended by the feedback. It's good to hear the client is pleased. |
|
| Author: | Z [ Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
No, no offence
I think the photographers like it as it's instant, you see the images rather than click, new page or click, pop up. It could also be a laptop thing. Many don't use a mouse these days so dragging on a bar is easier than moving it around to select an image, close a box? |
|
| Author: | bouncelot [ Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
What I've read about usability studies does seem to show that horizontal scrolling is a problem. People don't expect to scroll horizontally, so any content that is hidden in that way simply won't get seen by the majority of visitors. So unless the site's designed only to appeal to a small group who would expect that, it will reduce the usefulness of the site. |
|
| Author: | Z [ Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
usability studies? wtf? God help them if they had to use something like Excel. As I said the internet would be a boring place if nothing was ever different. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 1 hour |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|